178 Or. App. 289 - Abbott v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“directly traceable to, and [fell] within the scope of, the claims alleged in the post-conviction petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““A general term for an action, cause, suit or controversy, at law or in equity; a question contested before a court of justice; an aggregate of facts which furnishes occasion for the exercise of the jurisdiction of a court of justice. A judicial proceeding for the determination of a controversy between parties wherein rights are enforced or protected, or wrongs are prevented or redressed; any proceeding judicial in its nature.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“confined to choosing among only the arguments and authorities cited by [the petitioner] for or against [that] properly pleaded claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.