Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

178 Or. App. 534

State v. Passmore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2001

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2001-12-26

Applies OR 810 § 810.410

Decided 2001-12-26

PER CURIAM

¶1Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine, arguing that the police officer exceeded his authority under ORS 810.410(3)(b) (1995)1 when he extended a traffic stop to ask defendant to consent to a search of his vehicle without having reasonable suspicion to support the continued detention. The state concedes that, under the law as it existed at the time of the stop, the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress, and we agree. State v. Toevs, 327 Or 525, 964 P2d 1007 (1998); State v. Aguilar, 139 Or App 175, 912 P2d 379, rev den 323 Or 265 (1996).

¶2Reversed and remanded.

¶3 The version of ORS 810.410(3)(b) in effect in 1996, when the events in question occurred, continues to apply to this case. State v. Fugate, 332 Or 195, 26 P3d 802 (2001).

/178/orapp/534 · .json · Public domain