State v. Abrams’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center (2009), Davis v. Cox (2015)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Teague v. Lane · Johnson v. United States · Griffith v. Kentucky · New York v. Ferber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the constitutional and unconstitutional provisions are so connected ... that it could not be believed that the legislature would have passed one without the other; or where the part eliminated is so intimately connected with the balance ofthe act as to make it useless to accomplish the purposes ofthe legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of 34 El Centra de la Raza, et al. v. State, No. 94269-2 the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[a] statute is presumed to be constitutional, and the party challenging its constitutionality bears the burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hunter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.