Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 P.3d 908 - State v. Prows

State v. Prows’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Arvizu · Michigan v. Long · Alderman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rather, the collective knowledge doctrine ... allows [probable cause] ... to be based on the totality of the circumstances and the collective knowledge of all the officers involved.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “on these factors, le., the description of the vehicle, the direction it was traveling, the time and location, and the fact that there were no other cars in the area, the third factor regarding corroboration [was] satisfied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “almost contemporaneously, [one officer] spotted a vehicle traveling south and called [another officer] and told him to travel in the direction of the vehicle and intercept it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.