Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 P.3d 915 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 115

Relies on United States v. Orozco-Santillan · Bailey v. Bayles · United States v. Stewart · United States v. Martin · State v. Virgin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An attorney cannot, without the consent of the client, be examined as to any communication made by the client to the attorney or any advice given regarding the communication in the course of the professional employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To support bindover the must establish probable cause. In order to establish probable cause, the [state] must produce evidence sufficient to support a reasonable belief that the defendant committed the charged crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.