Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 SO 764 - Dimmer v. Spearman

Dimmer v. Spearman’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2006

3 state decisions

1019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 13 La. Ann. 476 - Williams v. Hunter · Jefferson Sawmill Co. v. Iowa & Louisiana Land Co. · Wilberding v. Maher · Palfrey v. Stinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The sale of a thing belonging to another person is null; it may give rise to damages, when the buyer knew not that the thing belonged to another person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.