Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 SO 778 - Brewer v. Foshee

Brewer v. Foshee’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1992

4 state decisions

101937194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Prall v. Peet's Curator · State ex rel. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co. v. St. Paul · Brewer v. Foshee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To sustain this action will mean that a new suit will be instituted against George Foshee, attended with much unnecessary trouble and inconvenience, and at the rate the present one has progressed, several years will have flown by before a final decree could be had.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.