Gumina v. Dupas’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 1994
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Norton Assignee v. Switzer · Helms v. Holmes · Accardo v. Dimiceli · Southland Inv. Co. v. Motor Sales Co. · Gumina v. Dupas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A final judgment shall be annulled if it is rendered: “(1) Against an incompetent person not represented as required by law; “(2) Against a defendant who has not been served with process as required by law and who has not entered a general appearance, or against whom a valid judgment by default has not been taken; or “(3) By a court which does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. “Except as otherwise provided in Article 2003, an action to annul a judgment on these grounds may be brought at any time.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Milner v. Milner““A final judgment obtained by fraud or ill practices may be annulled. “An action to annul a judgment on these grounds must be brought within one year of the discovery by the plaintiff in the nullity action of the fraud or ill practices.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.