Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

178 So. 2d 35

King v. King

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 17, 1965

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1965-08-17

Relies on 165 So. 2d 449 - Bambrick v. Bambrick · 165 So. 2d 834 - Security Trust Co. v. Cannon · McLean v. Little River Bank & Trust Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-08-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1996

4 state decisions

201965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HENDRY, Chief Judge.

¶1This is an appeal of an order of the circuit court dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.

¶2Plaintiffs filed their amended complaint in equity against the defendant guardian and her surety seeking, inter alia, imposition of a resulting or constructive trust, an accounting, and injunctive relief. The complaint was bottomed on a wilful misappropriation and conversion of the incompetent’s property. The acts complained of allegedly took place before and during the guardian’s tenure.

¶3It is our view that the amended complaint should not have been dismissed with prejudice. We recognize . the principles announced by this court in McLean v. Little River Bank &; Trust Co., Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 835, and in Security Trust Co. v. Cannon, Fla.App.1965, 165 So.2d 834 and are of the opinion that the holding in this case is consistent with both of those decisions.

¶4The Security Trust and McLean cases recognize that the circuit court jurisdiction may be invoked when it is made to appear that an adequate remedy in the probate court is not available. Proceedings by way of devastavit could not remedy all of the wrongs alleged in the amended compaint. Hence, plaintiffs should be allowed to amend their complaint to conform with rules announced in the Security Trust and McLean cases, supra. See also Bambrick v. Bambrick, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 449.

¶5The order of dismissal with prejudice is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

/178/so2d/35 · .json · Public domain