Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 SO3D 334 - Leavitt v. Carter

Leavitt v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Sandin v. Conner · West v. Atkins · Meachum v. Fano · Wilkinson v. Austin · Jenkins v. Haubert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, a disciplinary or administrative sanction [by prison officials] will not be considered to be an 'atypical and significant hardship' ... unless it is determined to be 'onerous.' " Id. at (¶ 20) (citation omitted). It is within the discretion of the prison officials "to determine whether and when to provide prisoners with privileges [that] amount to more than reasonably adequate food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care, and personal safety.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “will be generally limited to freedom from restraint[,] which, while not exceeding the sentence in such an unexpected manner as to give rise to protection by the Due Process Clause of its own force, nonetheless imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Generally, a disciplinary or administrative sanction [by prison officials] will not be considered to be an 'atypical and significant hardship' ... unless it is determined to be 'onerous.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.