Shah v. Shah’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 547 So. 2d 198 - EPIC METALS CORPORATION v. Samari Lake East Condominium Association, Inc. · STATE, DEPT. OF REV. v. Thurmond · 76 So. 3d 1035 - Rodriguez v. Santana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Due process requires proper notice and an opportunity to be heard. The trial court’s July 30, 2014 notice of hearing notified the parties that if an answer to the petition had been filed, the hearing would serve as a status conference rather than a final hearing. The trial court, however, changed the nature and expanded the scope of the scheduled hearing without proper notice. In doing so, the court violated the wife’s due process rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pinnock v. Whyte
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.