Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 SW3D 139 - Edwards v. State

Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 262nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Guzman v. State · Geesa v. State · Johnson v. State · Sharp v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) the contraband was in plain view; 2) the contraband was conveniently accessible to the accused; 3) the accused was the owner of the place where the contraband was found; 4) the accused was the driver of the automobile in which the contraband was found; 5) the contraband was found on the same side of the car seat as the accused was sitting; 6) the place where the contraband was found was enclosed; 7) the odor of [the contraband] was present; 8) paraphernalia to use the contraband was in view of or found on the accused; 9) conduct by the accused indicated a consciousness of guilt; 10) the accused has a special connection to the contraband; 11) occupants of the automobile gave conflicting statements about relevant matters; 12) the physical- condition of the accused indicated recent consumption of the contraband found in the car; and 13) affirmative statements connect the accused to the contraband.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “intentionally or knowingly operates another's boat, airplane, or motor-propelled vehicle without the effective consent of the owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “consent by a person legally authorized to act for the owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.