Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 SW3D 21 - Rayme v. State

Rayme v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 262nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. State · McDuff v. State · Bone v. State · Duffy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... evidence may be offered by the state and the defendant as to any matter the court deems relevant to sentencing, including but not limited to the prior criminal record of the defendant, his general reputation, his character, an opinion regarding his character, the circumstances of the offense for which he is being tried, and, notwithstanding Rules 404 and 405, Texas Rules of Evidence, any other evidence of an extraneous crime or bad act that is shown beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence to have been committed by the defendant or for which he could be held criminally responsible, regardless of whether he has previously been charged with or finally convicted of the crime or act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.