Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 SW3D 470 - White v. Commonwealth

White v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ake v. Oklahoma · Bowling v. Commonwealth · Soto v. Commonwealth · Funk v. Commonwealth · State v. Gaines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he evidence presented at trial supported only two theories: that Appellant was an active participant in planning the crime and intended that it be carried out, or that he was an innocent bystander who happened to be present when some of the instruments used in the crime were acquired. There was no evidence of a middle-ground violation of the facilitation statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Jane Doe.” 2 . SeeKy. Const. § 110(2)(b). 3 . Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 502.020 governs complicity. Under that statute, a defendant is guilty of an offense committed by another person if the defendant, inter alia,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.