Moran v. Hubbartt’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brizendine v. Conrad · Farley v. Farley · Richard B. Curnow, M.D., Inc. v. Sloan · Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Mid-West Electronics, Inc. · Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance of Missouri v. Hilderbrand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that [it] provided the [Defendants] services at the [Defendants'] request or with their acquiescence; (2) the services [provided] were of a certain and reasonable value; and (3) the [Defendants] refused to pay for such services after demand”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.