State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Reese · State v. Bernard · State v. Sladek · State v. Simmons · State v. Barriner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial court must carefully consider that `the inevitable tendency of such evidence is to raise a legally spurious presumption of guilt in the minds of the jurors.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sapien“no other evidence is required to establish intent unless the state has some reason to believe that the defendant will make intent or mistake or accident an issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Jah“Generally, `trial courts should be wary of evidence of other crimes due to the highly prejudicial character of such evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sapien
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.