¶1dissenting.
¶2When we changed the disposition of statute of limitations in Proctor and Le-mell
¶3. 967 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.Crim.App.1998)
178 S.W.3d 797
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 19, 2005
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 2005-10-19
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Ex Parte Ellis (2010), Ex Parte Doster (2010)
30 state decisions
Relies on Proctor v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-10-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1dissenting.
¶2When we changed the disposition of statute of limitations in Proctor and Le-mell
¶3. 967 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.Crim.App.1998)