Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

178 S.W.3d 797

Ex Parte Smith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 2005

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 2005-10-19

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Ex Parte Ellis (2010), Ex Parte Doster (2010)

30 state decisions

Relies on Proctor v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MEYERS, J.,

¶1dissenting.

¶2When we changed the disposition of statute of limitations in Proctor and Le-mell1 we suggested many ways for defendants to seek pre trial relief. Because of the tenuous nature of statutes of limitations, I would allow this claim to be brought on pretrial habeas. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

¶3. 967 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.Crim.App.1998)

/178/sw3d/797 · .json · Public domain