Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 U.S. 541 - Hicks v. Knost

Hicks v. Knost’s Empirical Analysis

178 U.S. 541 · 1900

Citation profile

172
cited by 172 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
August 1985
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 54 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 172 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1985 · most notably Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co. (1931), Straton v. New (1931)

61 federal appellate · 54 district · 13 state decisions

600190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · Hicks v. Knost

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 172 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The District Court, has such jurisdiction by tbe consent of the proposed defendant, hut not otherwise.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.