Gray v. Greyhound Lines, East’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1996
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The use in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 of the language 'a person claiming to be aggrieved' shows a congressional intention to define standing as broadly as is permitted by Article III of the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Valeo“failure to take all reasonable steps to oppose the discriminatory employment practices of the Company.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“now recognize * * * that proof of (their seniority) claim will be extraordinarily difficult.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.