Stusser v. Gottstein’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1996
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoge v. George · Hogan v. Kyle · Durand v. Heney · Stein v. Waddell · Underwood v. Tew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Considering, then, the agreement in the light of both its express and its necessarily implied provisions, we have a situation where, upon the giving of the required notice by appellant, there was a duty on the part of the respondent to purchase appellant’s interest in the lease, and a corresponding duty on the part of appellant to convey his joint interest therein. These obligations were dependent and concurrent, and as such were to be simultaneously performed, in tbe absence of a contrary understanding or agreement. [Citing authorities.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stusser v. Gottstein““September 6, 1928. “In consideration of A. S. Stusser purchasing jointly with myself a certain assignment of lease dated August 20, 1928, from the Arjo Investment Company, which is recorded on February 19, 1925, Volume 48 Book of Leases, page 472, I agree to refund A. S. Stusser any amounts paid by him on said lease on or before June 30th upon five days notice. “Joseph Gottstein.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stusser v. Gottstein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.