Siebert v. Jacob Dudenhoefer Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 1993
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aultman Taylor Co. v. . Syme · Klingbeil v. Saucerman · Presbrey v. Williams · Seymour v. Board of Supervisors · Kalckhoff v. Zoehklaut
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The rule is well established on an issue of limitation where the time is to be computed from a certain date, that in the computation the day of the date is to be excluded, and where the computation is from a certain event, the date of that event must be included.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““This statute evidently creates an exception to the general rule, applicable only where the time limited is expressed in days, and clearly implies that where the limitation is expressed in weeks, months, or years the first day is included.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.