Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Wis. 2d 20 - State v. Johnston

178 Wis. 2d 20 - State v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Carnegie v. United States · Lewis v. United States · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Uniformed officers had Johnston's building surrounded and could have stopped those persons leaving the party. Likewise, the police could have prevented the removal of the kegs. The officers knew that Johnston's party had just started so it was not likely that it would end soon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “A general principle in Wisconsin is that additional officers may enter an individual's home after one officer has been legally admitted provided that they do not expand the scope or intensity of the search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “expanded the original search beyond what the undercover team had witnessed inadvertently and in plain view.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.