Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 WIS2D 823 - State v. Heft

State v. Heft’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · Chambers v. Mississippi · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · California v. Trombetta · Baxter v. Palmigiano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not apply in a civil case with respect to the privilege against self-incrimination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the right to confront and to cross-examine is not absolute and may, in appropriate cases, bow to accommodate other legitimate interests in the criminal trial process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Injury cases, proceedings shall be conducted, to the extent practicable, so as to facilitate the making of claims of privilege without the knowledge of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.