Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 W. Va. 280 - Koay v. Koay

178 W. Va. 280 - Koay v. Koay’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2001

6 state decisions

20198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Consolidated Gas Supply Corp. v. Riley · 161 W. Va. 782 - Consolidated Gas Supply Corp. v. Riley · 82 W. Va. 453 - Loudin v. Cunningham · Appeal of Paslay · 27 Ariz. App. 477 - MR CROSSMAN v. Meek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By virtue of W.Va.Code, 37-4-3, a party desiring to compel partition through sale is required to demonstrate that the property cannot be conveniently partitioned in kind, that the interests of one or more of the parties will be promoted by the sale, and that the interests of the other parties will not be prejudiced by the sale.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A partition sale is a forced sale, and for that reason courts have been hesitant to find that a bid substantially below an appraised value or an arm’s length transaction value is so grossly inadequate to shock the conscience. Bids often amounting to only 50% or less of the appraised or arm’s length value have been upheld.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.