Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 A3D 511 - Commonwealth v. Root

Commonwealth v. Root’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Wallace · 403 Pa. Super. 467 - Commonwealth v. McClendon · 2009 Pa. Super. 66 - Commonwealth v. Parsons · 2017 Pa. Super. 14 - Commonwealth v. Rivera · 2017 Pa. Super. 91 - Commonwealth v. Andrews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To overcome this presumption, a PCRA petitioner must plead and prove that: (1) the underlying legal claim is of arguable merit; (2) counsel's action or inaction lacked any objectively reasonable basis designed to effectuate his client's interest; and (3) prejudice, to the effect that there was a reasonable probability of a different outcome if not for counsel's error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.