¶1I concur fully in the opinion of Presiding Justice Clarke and in the views expressed by Mr. Justice Shearn, excepting in so far as he holds that the determination to.print the names of the several candidates in the same relative position on all the ballots is unnecessarily unfair, arbitrary and discriminatory and that a writ of mandamus should issue prohibiting it.
179 A.D. 582
Walsh v. Boyle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 16, 1917
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1917-08-16
Appeals by the relator, John L. Walsh, and by the intervenors, Republican County Committee of the County of New York and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of August, 1917, denying in part an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the board of elections to print the names of candidates for certain judicial offices on the official…
Decided 1917-08-16