¶1dissenting in part, is of the opinion that defendant waived objection to the admission of the Birmingham ordinance by not objecting specifically on the ground that proof of its prior operation had not been made, and holds that the affirmative charges for defendant on counts 3 and 5 were properly refused. He also holds that the oral charge of the trial court, in the particular discussed, was free from error.
179 Ala. 97
Adler v. Martin
Decided June 13, 1912
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1912-06-13
¡Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. A. O. Lane. Action by E. L. Martin, as administrator, against'S. M. Adler. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Plaintiff’s intestate, a man 29 years of age, was killed about 10 a. m. on May 7, 1910, on Twenty-First Street Bridge, in the city of Birmingham, by an automobile belonging to tbe defendant, and driven by defendant’s servant.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed and remanded · Decided 1912-06-13
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently September 1971 · most notably Ivy v. Marx (1920), Moran v. Gatz (1945)
2 federal appellate · 69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →