Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 Ariz. 299 - Trantor v. Fredrikson

Trantor v. Fredrikson’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably In Re Marriage of Pownall (2000), State v. Moreno-Medrano (2008)

1 federal appellate · 78 state decisions

4401994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner · State v. Richey · Johnson v. Elliott · United States (Treasury Dept., IRS) v. Globe Corp. · 26 Ariz. App. 265 - Bayless Investment & Trading Co. v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are certainly helpful on appellate review, they do not go to the foundation of the case or deprive a party of a fair hearing. If the court has failed to make findings and a party wants them, all one has to do is to make that issue known in the trial court. The trial court will either make findings or it will not. If it does, the party gets what it wants. If it fails to do so, the issue is preserved for review. But by failing to act at all, a litigant is not in the position to complain about how helpful findings would have been on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Because a trial court ... should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects ... errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”). 9 . The Spanish version of the lease contains nearly identical language. 10 . The Spanish version of Section 3181 states:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.