Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 Cal. 409 - In Re Garner

In Re Garner’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2014 · most notably 8 Cal. 3d 410 - In Re Lynch (1972), 44 Cal. 3d 283 - Michael G. v. Superior Court (1988)

39 state decisions

7019181920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re the Estate of Jessup · State ex inf. Crow v. Shepherd · Ex parte Creasy · Smith v. Westerfield · State v. McCauley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in such eases conceding the existence of such power vested in the courts, we are not prepared to adopt respondent’s theory that our constitutional courts possess inherent power to the full extent as did the courts of England, which in some cases we find imposed enormous fines and imprisonment for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “would be tantamount to a denial of legislative power to regulate the practice and procedure by which our courts are governed, a power which, without constitutional authority, is universally recognized in all states where the code system of pleading and practice prevails.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “takes from the courts all power to punish for contempt, or fixes a penalty wholly inadequate for the purpose, would not be countenanced by the courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.