179 Conn. App. 461 - State v. Esquilin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'on the one hand, the defendant's interest in confronting the declarant, against, on the other hand, the government's reasons for not producing the witness and the reliability of the proffered hearsay. United States v. Williams , 443 F.3d 35 , 45 (2d Cir. 2006) ; see also United States v. Chin , 224 F.3d 121 , 124 (2d Cir. 2000).' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shakir, 130 Conn. App. 458 , 468, 22 A.3d 1285 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 931 , 28 A.3d 345 (2011).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Fears

2. “a defendant's due process claim is unpreserved where the defendant never argued to the trial court that it was required to balance his interest in cross-examining the victim against the state's good cause for not calling the victim as a witness”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 190 Conn. App. 639 - State v. Crespo

3. “in his objection before the trial court, his claim on appeal is predicated on the due process rights contained in the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution, which mandate”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 190 Conn. App. 639 - State v. Crespo