Halligan v. Wayne’s Empirical Analysis
179 F. 112 · 1910
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1973
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lyons v. People · Wilson v. State · Lewis v. President of the Bank of Kentucky · Commonwealth v. Birdsall · State v. McClung
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““One accused of burglary with intent to commit larceny may in a second count of the same indictment be charged with the larceny, and on such an indictment may be convicted and punished for either offense, but not for both; and, when there is a general verdict of guilty, he may be sentenced for the burglary only.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. Moyer““If the larceny charged in the second count appears, in proof, to have been committed, at the time of the breaking and entering, then it is merged, and the conviction is properly for burglary, and the sentence must be accordingly.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Munson v. McClaughry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.