Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

179 F. 77

Docket No. 3,067.

Seep v. Spade

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1910.)

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1910-04-11

<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.</p> <p>Suit in equity by Robert Spade, by J. T. Parks, his guardian and next friend, against William J. Seep, T. N. Barnsdall, and the Midland Oil Company. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1928

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Midland Oil Co. v. Turner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Modified and affirmed · Opinion by William Cather Hook · Decided 1910-04-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

¶2Suit in equity by Robert Spade, by J. T. Parks, his guardian and next friend, against William J. Seep, T. N. Barnsdall, and the Midland Oil Company. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal.

¶3Modified and affirmed.

¶4*78Edgar Smith and' Eugene Mackey (Zevely,’ Given’s & Smith 'and Cornelius D." Scully, on the brief), for appellants.

¶5Kenneth S. Murchison (M. O. -Reville and A. A. Davidson, on the brief), for appellee.

¶6Before HOOK and ADAMS, Circuit Judges, and AMIDON, District Judge.

¶7HOOK, Circuit Judge.

¶8The essential facts in this case are like those in Midland Oil Company et al. v. Susan Turner (just decided) 179 Fed. 74, and there is a stipulation' that this case shall abide the result of the other.

¶9It is therefore remanded to the Circuit Court fór a like modification of the decree, and, as so modified, the decree is affirmed.

/179/f1d/77 · .json · Public domain