Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 F.2d 114 - Johnson v. Gardner

Johnson v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

179 F.2d 114 · 1949

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2000 · most notably Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg (1989), Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co. (1975)

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

1401949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110 · 28 U.S.C. § 4

Relies on Schoenthal v. Irving Trust Co. · Delno v. Market St. Ry. Co. · Philpott v. Superior Court · Ring v. Spina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) By the Court. Issues not demanded for trial by jury as provided in Rule 38 shall be tried by the court; but, notwithstanding the failure of a party to demand a jury in an action in which such a demand might have been made of right, the court in its discretion upon motion may order a trial by a jury of any or all issues.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(b) Demand. Any party may demand a trial by jury of any issue triable of right by a jury by serving upon the other parties a demand therefor in writing at any time after the commencement of the action and not later than 10 days after the service of the last pleading directed to such issue. Such demand may be indorsed upon a pleading of the party.” “(d) Waiver. The failure of a party to serve a demand as required by this rule and to file it as required by Rule 5(d) constitutes a waiver by him of trial by jury. A demand for trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.