Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

179 F.2d 239

Docket No. 10947.

Harold R. Love v. Raymond L. Springer

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-12-06

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1949

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1949-12-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky; Roy M. Shelbourne, Judge.

Harold R. Love, Minneapolis, Minn., pro se.

David C. Walls, John A. Fulton, Louisville, Ky., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

It appearing that the conditions upon which we granted additional time to the appellant for perfecting his record on appeal have not been complied with and that no additional time has been requested within the period of permitted compliance,

¶2

It is ordered that the appeal be and it is hereby dismissed.

/179/f2d/239 · .json · Public domain