Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 F.2d 416 - Hueter v. Compco Corp.

Hueter v. Compco Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

179 F.2d 416 · 1950

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
September 1974
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 1974 · most notably Associated Plastics Companies, Inc. v. Gits Molding Corp. (1950), Kennatrack Corp. v. Stanley Works (1963)

20 federal appellate · 3 district ·

190195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co. · Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co. · Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co. · Smith v. Dental Products Co. · Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where, as here, however, invention is plainly lacking, commercial success cannot fill the void.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whoever invents any new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. The provisions of this title relating to patents for inventions shall apply to patents for designs except as otherwise provided.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In a close case evidence of the commercial success may tip the scales in determining whether an improvement amounts to an invention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.