Reck v. Hunter

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Jan. 5, 1950.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-01-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1967

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on McMahan v. Hunter · Dickens v. Hunter

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-01-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas

Frederick M. Kal, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Lt. Col. Reginald C. Miller, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Washington, D.C., and Lester Luther, United States Attorney, and Malcolm Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Judgment of the District Court affirmed January 5, 1950, on authority of McMahan v. Hunter, 179 F.2d 661, without prejudice to the filing of a new application for a writ of habeas corpus after having first complied with the requirements of Article of War 53, 10 U.S.C.A. 1525.