Jenkins v. Haubert’s Empirical Analysis
179 F.3d 19 · 1999
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 14 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 170 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably Muhammad v. Close (2004), Wyatt v. Terhune (2003)
55 federal appellate · 14 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Heck v. Humphrey · Sandin v. Conner · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Spencer v. Kemna
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 170 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“revealed that five justices hold the view that, where federal habeas corpus is not available to address constitutional wrongs, § 1983 must be,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e hold that a § 1983 suit by a prisoner ... challenging the validity of a disciplinary or administrative sanction that does not affect the overall length of the prisoner's confinement is not barred by Heck and Edwards .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a prisoner may bring a § 1983 claim `challenging the conditions of [his] confinement where [he] is unable to challenge the conditions through a petition for federal habeas corpus.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alejo v. Heller · Gilles v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.