Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 F.3d 641 - Epstein v. MCA, Inc.

Epstein v. MCA, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

179 F.3d 641 · 1999

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
11
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of America (2012), Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Daccach (2007)

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 14 state decisions — followed in 11 states

2601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738

Relies on Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Flast v. Cohen · Montana v. United States · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due process requires that an absent class member's right to adequate representation be protected by the adoption of the appropriate procedures by the certifying court and by the courts that review its determinations; due process does not require collateral second-guessing of those determinations and that review.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Simply put, the absent class members' due process right to adequate representation is protected not by collateral review, but by the [Delaware] certifying court initially, and thereafter by appeal within the state system and by direct review in the United States Supreme Court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the [collaterally attacking] plaintiffs seek to raise claims that received neither determination nor review in the Delaware courts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.