Ramos v. Diaz’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2005
10 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3184
Relies on Karadzole v. Artukovic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i)f any question shall arise as to whether a case comes within ... (the political offense exception) the decision of the authorities of the government on which the demand for surrender is made ... shall be final.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not by the motives of those who subsequently handle the prosecution”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Koskotas v. Roche
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.