Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

179 Ga. 733

Martin v. Ware

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1934

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1934-11-16

Relies on Baxter v. Phillips · Garrett v. Adrain · Chance v. Simpkins

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-11-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1950

3 state decisions

10193419401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Russell, O. J.

¶11. “Where the issues of a ease are submitted to the judge, without the intervention of a jury, for his decision upon all matters of fact and of law, and he renders a judgment therein in term time, the losing party may review the judgment either by a direct bill of exceptions or by a motion for a new trial.” Chance v. Simpkins, 146 Ga. 519.

¶22. The evidence was sufficient to support the plaintiffs’ claim of title by prescription. The judge did not err in rendering the decree in favor of plaintiffs, establishing such claim of title. Garrett v. Adrain, 44 Ga. 274; Baxter v. Phillips, 150 Ga. 498 (104 S. E. 196); Chandler v. Douglas, 178 Ga. 11 (172 S. E. 54); Tatum v. Wilson, 179 Ga. 688.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, and Hutcheson, JJ. who dissent.Fariss & Langford, for plaintiffs in error.Rosser & Shaw, contra.
/179/ga/733 · .json · Public domain