Barkley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2001
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dover v. Dover · Buxton v. State · Stripland v. State · McGinnis v. Ragsdale · 157 Ga. App. 795 - Huckeba v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Any person against whom a true bill of indictment... is filed . . . may enter a demand for trial at the court term at which the indictment ... is filed or at the next succeeding regular court term thereafter. . . . (b) If the person is not tried when the demand is made or at the next succeeding regular court term thereafter, provided at both court terms there were juries impaneled and qualified to try him, he shall be absolutely discharged and acquitted of the offense charged. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.