Snider v. Snider’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 1981 · most notably O'Connor v. O'Connor (1969), State Ex Rel. Sims v. Hendricks Circuit Court (1956)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harding v. Harding · Davis v. Davis · Merritt v. . Merritt · Sellers v. Sellers · Cooper v. Cooper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It must be made to appear as one of the essential conditions upon which the wife will be granted the allowance, that she has not sufficient means to provide for her own support adequately and to pay the expenses of properly preparing and prosecuting or defending the action. The ability of the husband to pay should also be made to appear. 14 Cyc. 743-761; 3 Am. and Eng. Ency. Law and Pr. 139-156; 2 Am. and Eng. Ency. Law (2d ed.) 99-114; 2 Bishop. Mar., Div., and Sep. §§ 965, 978, 979.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crowell v. Crowell““This is a wise and humane provision of the law, and upon the trial court is enjoined the duty to carefully and properly exercise the discretionary powers thereby granted. “The law does not contemplate that the husband shall be oppressed by the allowance, neither does it intend that where his means are ample the court shall weigh the amount awarded in ‘the scales of an apothecary.’ The statute means and intends a sum sufficient to insure an efficient preparation and a fair trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crowell v. Crowell“Whether the necessity for the allowance exists, and the ability of the husband to pay, as well as the amount to be allowed is within the sound discretion of the trial court to determine upon the facts before it. This judicial discretion is, it is true, subject to review on appeal, but it will be interfered with only when a clear abuse of it by unfair and arbitrary action is shown.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bitner v. Bitner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.