Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 Ind. App. 209 - Gansert v. Meeks

179 Ind. App. 209 - Gansert v. Meeks’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 1993
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1993

15 state decisions

100197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bishop v. Wood · Connell v. Higginbotham · Sidle v. Majors · Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The sheriff may discharge, demote, or temporarily suspend any county policeman, for cause, after preferring charges in writing and after a fair public hearing before the board, reviewable in the circuit court, a notice of which charges and hearing shall be delivered by certified mail to the county policeman to be discharged, demoted or temporarily suspended. Such county policeman may be represented by counsel. The sheriff may temporarily suspend without a hearing before the board, any county policeman, after preferring charges of misconduct in writing delivered to such county policeman, for a period not to exceed fifteen [15] days. No county policeman shall be discharged, demoted, or temporarily suspended because of political affiliation, nor shall any county policeman be discharged, demoted, or temporarily suspended after his probationary period, except as provided in this act [17-3-14-1 — 17-3-14-19]. For the purpose of hearings provided in this act, the board shall have subpoena powers enforcible [sic] by the circuit court. Probationers may be discharged by the sheriff without right to hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.