179 Ind. App. 592 - Kline v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

42 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) a false representation or concealment of material facts [is] made with actual or constructive knowledge of the true state of facts; and (2) the representation is made to one who is without knowledge or reasonable means of knowing the true facts with the intent that he or she will rely upon it; and (3) the second party must rely or act upon such representation to his or her detriment.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Inland Metals Refining Co. v. Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. · McNevin v. McNevin

2. “In circumstances where boundary disputes arise due to the erection of fences or other structures, the supplementary element of tax payments is inapplicable, since it does not serve as notice to the recorded titleholder that the identical described land on the tax statement is being adversely claimed by another.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ford v. Eckert

3. “'Indiana courts have held that once title vests in a party at the conclusion of the ten year possessory period, the title is not lost, abandoned, or forfeited even though the party ... [states] that he does not claim the land and offers to buy it.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Marathon Petroleum Co. v. Colonial Motel Properties, Inc.