Windle v. Wire’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2011
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Avery · State v. Bechtelheimer · State v. Gillen · State v. Marshall · State v. Crane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To justify binding over for trial a person accused of crime, it is only necessary at the preliminary examination that sufficient evidence be adduced to satisfy the examining magistrate that a crime has been committed and that the accused is probably guilty.” Application of Windle, 179 Kan. 239 , 294 P.2d 213, 214 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Green v. Whipple““The prohibitions of G. S. 1949, 21-554, apply to postdated checks, and checks to be presented for payment at a future date.” (Syl. ¶ 3.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Beard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.