Mathey v. Mathey’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1969
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pico v. Cohn · Bleakley v. Barclay · Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City Township · Mathey v. Mathey · Garrett Biblical Institute v. Minard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Despite the difficulty often encountered in making a practical application of the distinction between the two types of fraud, it is clear from the foregoing authorities that, generally speaking, ‘extrinsic fraud’ relates to acts which prevent a fair presentation of a controversy, and that ‘intrinsic fraud’ relates to acts which prevent a fair determination of the issues once a court has a controversy before it.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thornton v. Thornton““The district court shall have power to vacate or modify its own judgments or orders, at or after the term at which such judgment or order was made: “Fourth. For fraud, practiced by the successful party, in obtaining the judgment or order.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fincher v. Fincher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.