Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 Kan. 603 - State v. Callahan

State v. Callahan’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1957
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Reed · State v. Winchester · State v. Kirby · State v. Frizzell · State v. Hays

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a general rule, upon the trial of a criminal action evidence of the commission of other independent and unrelated crimes by the defendant, is inadmissible.” (Syl. 1) “Exceptions to the general rule above stated are that evidence of other crimes by the defendant, similar to that being tried, is admissible when it shows or tends to show a particular criminal intent which is necessary to constitute the crime charged, or when such evidence shows or tends to show identity, intent, method, plan, system, malice, inclination or tendencies on the part of the defendant to commit similar crimes, as the case may be.” (Syl. 2)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.