Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 KY 725 - Barnes v. Commonwealth

Barnes v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Drury v. Franke (1933), Ratliff v. Commonwealth (1918)

61 state decisions

26019181920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnston v. Commonwealth · Ellis v. Commonwealth · Heck v. Commonwealth · Day v. Commonwealth · Childers v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a new trial is asked on the ground that a juror has been guilty of misconduct, the person seeking a neAv trial on this ground should do so at the earliest moment after he has received information of the misconduct complained of, and should file his affidaAdt stating when he obtained the information. If the party seeking a new trial on this ground fails to do this, he will be deemed to have waived his right to rely on the misconduct as a ground for a new trial after there has been a verdict against him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““While we fully appreciate and approve the rigidity of the rule against permitting a separation of the jury in a case where capital punishment may be inflicted, we do not think this separation furnishes grounds for a reversal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.