Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 LED2D 233 - Skinner v. Switzer

Skinner v. Switzer’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

339
cited by 339 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

92 federal appellate · 40 district · 13 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Heck v. Humphrey · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 339 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “will ultimately prevail ... but whether his complaint [is] sufficient to cross the federal court's threshold.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “generally requires only a plausible 'short and plain' statement of the plaintiff's claim, not an exposition of his legal argument.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he losing party in state court filed suit in a U.S. District Court after the state proceedings ended, complaining of an injury caused by the state-court judgment and seeking federal-court review and rejection of that judgment. Alleging federal-question jurisdiction, the plaintiffs in Rooker and Feldman asked the District Court to overturn the injurious state-court judgment. [The Supreme Court] held, in both cases, that the District Courts lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over such claims, for 28 U.S.C. § 1257 "vests authority to review a state court's judgment solely in [the Supreme Court]"”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.