Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 LED2D 93 - Michigan v. Bryant

Michigan v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

939
cited by 939 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
43
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

207 federal appellate · 69 district · 329 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 939 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably Torgerson v. City of Rochester (2011), State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion) (2016)

207 federal appellate · 69 district · 329 state decisions — followed in 43 states

891020112020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Davis v. Washington · Idaho v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 939 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there may be other circumstances, aside from ongoing emergencies, when a statement is not procured with a primary purpose of creating an out-of-court substitute for trial testimony.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Statements are nontestimonial when made in the course of police interrogation under circumstances objectively indicating that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency. They are testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no such ongoing emergency, and that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.